<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jared Brickman's Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-abf83e80" type="application/json"/><link>http://jaredbrickman-blog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://jaredbrickman-blog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:23:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spokeo</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2011/01/12/spokeo/#comment-134452736</link><description>Your post contains a lot of good information and I'm glad you've shared how to opt out of this service. I hadn't heard of Spokeo before this post which only shows the rapid growth of information brokers’ sites and services that can be found on line.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now what to do about it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For this is an example of the confusing nature of privacy on line. Many of us spend our online time blogging, tweeting, commenting, and getting Google and others search engines to index it all so we can be found. Then along comes a site like Spokeo that is set up to compile data from many sites, blogs, indexes, and data bases that provides just such public access. But since it’s a site we know little about and have no control over what they show and can only opt out of being listed or leave any search results available we have to decide;  do we opt out of being listed on Spokeo or leave our listing there and available.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly personally I'm still considering if I want to opt out of Spokeo or not. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the one hand it's a site that is kind of scary as it is a very comprehensive collection of information that I'm not sure I want available all at one site. But on the other hand it's all information that's available anyway and much if not all of it is on Google or other search engines already. And I’m sure that even if I opt out of Spokeo another site just like it is either out there now or soon will be that does the same thing. So is opting out of Spokeo really changing anything? Or do I just have to accept that mega personal search sites are something I have to learn to live with?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For I could with a simple link to Spokeo’s search results on me make all my blogs, sites, and social network accounts available for people to find. Or I could opt out of Spokeo and continue to list links and work to be indexed as I’ve always done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right now I’m just not sure which it will be. &lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank Woodman Jr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:23:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Make a Press Kit or EPK for your Band</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/03/03/how-to-make-a-press-kit-or-epk-for-your-band/#comment-85204653</link><description>Thanks for the help, Jared! &lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lou Tambone</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:40:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Now &amp;#8220;Topeka&amp;#8221;. No really it is.</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/04/01/google-now-topeka-no-really-it-is/#comment-42718066</link><description>I have friends in Topeka, I mean Google and wanted to see the satellite view of their home. When I went to &lt;a href="http://maps.google.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;maps.google.com&lt;/a&gt; and zoomed in on Google, KS, it is still labled as Topeka. I don't understand this. I thought Topeka was on top of things there in Mountain View.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:13:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Now &amp;#8220;Topeka&amp;#8221;. No really it is.</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/04/01/google-now-topeka-no-really-it-is/#comment-42717965</link><description>I have friends in Topeka, I mean Google and wanted to see the satellite view of their home. When I went to &lt;a href="http://maps.google.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;maps.google.com&lt;/a&gt; and zoomed in on Google, KS, it is still labled as Topeka. I don't understand this. I thought Topeka was on top of things there in Mountain View.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Now &amp;#8220;Topeka&amp;#8221;. No really it is.</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/04/01/google-now-topeka-no-really-it-is/#comment-42699486</link><description>If it wasn't April Fool's Day... I'd think they'd lost their mind.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johnny</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:41:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topeka now &amp;#8220;Google, Kansas&amp;#8221;. No really &amp;#8211; it is.</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/03/02/topeka-now-google-kansas-no-really-it-is/#comment-42692931</link><description>"brow-nosing"?  Is that along the same lines as "a moo point" and "mind-bottling"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Butler Community College Free College Course Day Was Great</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/03/28/butler-community-college-free-college-course-day-was-great/#comment-42156613</link><description>Thanks! With the way technology advances so quickly - we probably just ought to wait 'til next year!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:57:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Butler Community College Free College Course Day Was Great</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/03/28/butler-community-college-free-college-course-day-was-great/#comment-42156271</link><description>Consider yourself invited back, sir! It was an awesome day...in the most part because of top-notch volunteer instructors like yourself. You had great topics that led to great interest and attendance. Thanks again...now, what's on tap for you to teach next year.....?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@rentz1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topeka now &amp;#8220;Google, Kansas&amp;#8221;. No really &amp;#8211; it is.</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/03/02/topeka-now-google-kansas-no-really-it-is/#comment-37700421</link><description>Thank you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:36:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topeka now &amp;#8220;Google, Kansas&amp;#8221;. No really &amp;#8211; it is.</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/03/02/topeka-now-google-kansas-no-really-it-is/#comment-37699316</link><description>Excellent stats - and a great point of view. I wish everyone in the blogosphere was as careful when they thought out their opinions. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jared Starkey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topeka now &amp;#8220;Google, Kansas&amp;#8221;. No really &amp;#8211; it is.</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/03/02/topeka-now-google-kansas-no-really-it-is/#comment-37650542</link><description>So if I Google, Kansas will it google the other cities and towns in Kansas??  ;-(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msdrpepper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hutch Memorial Hall Gets It</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/02/28/hutch-memorial-hall-gets-it/#comment-37382572</link><description>Thanks Jared!  Can't wait to see the latest version of &lt;a href="http://RokICT.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;RokICT.com&lt;/a&gt;!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara Goertz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:53:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Bans 5000 Sexy iPhone apps</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/02/22/apple-bans-5000-sexy-iphone-apps/#comment-36990847</link><description>From a user's perspective, I am definitely glad things got cleaned up in the store.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Bans 5000 Sexy iPhone apps</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/02/22/apple-bans-5000-sexy-iphone-apps/#comment-36398377</link><description>Keep in mind that Jobs initially scoffed at the idea of opening the door for app development on the iPhone altogether. Fast forward to the present day, where it seems like every other app in the store is useful for only a laugh (gag) or a lame assembly of eye candy (pardon me... iCandy!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think he (and most of the iPhone community) simply had enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find the move refeshing, as it "cleans up" a store that was heavy on crAPPS. That's not to say that some of the more "clever" NC-17 apps weren't without merit. But seriously, how many variations of "Pocket Girlfriend" does one store need?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Boo Hoo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:21:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Somebody is suing Suede Piano Bar</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/02/22/somebody-is-suing-suede-piano-bar/#comment-35973835</link><description>As far as I know - the Rowdy Beaver has long been closed. Brickyard? What did they do?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Somebody is suing Suede Piano Bar</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/02/22/somebody-is-suing-suede-piano-bar/#comment-35965823</link><description>&lt;br&gt;Looks like they finally are being called out. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;THEY OWED 1600 for a website?!?! holy crap. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;good luck Maria..and Jared.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">'Kevin Heckart Cloyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:20:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Somebody is suing Suede Piano Bar</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/02/22/somebody-is-suing-suede-piano-bar/#comment-35965566</link><description>Glad to hear someone finally did this.  I'm curious if anyone has a lawsuit in the works for Rowdy Beaver, or the Brickyard,  they pull (or pulled) the same kind of stuff</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brader</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:16:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Somebody is suing Suede Piano Bar</title><link>http://www.jbrickman.com/2010/02/22/somebody-is-suing-suede-piano-bar/#comment-35964387</link><description>yesssss, it was just matter of time, we have 3 bad checks for $1600 for a web site design..after waiting for 6 months the web site was turned off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maria Jose'</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
